Greenwood v. Murray
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Bamsey county, Brill, J., presiding, sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
Gileillan, G. J.-
Meliza J. Miller made a will, devising in terms to defendant Murray certain real estate, in trust to sell the same five years after the death of the testatrix, and pay the proceeds to certain persons named. The will was duly proved and admitted to probate in the probate court of Bamsey county, December 8, 1873. On June 17, 1874, the probate court, by a decree reciting that the estate had been fully-administered, assigned the real estate to Murray, in trust for the purposes expressed in'the will. The devise to Murray was the only disposition of property made by the will. This…
2Cited by35 opinions
- Crew v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Shattuck v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Farnham v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Seymour v. McAvoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Armstrong v. LettySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.