Legal Opinion
Murray v. Calkins
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 27, 1934No. 29,843PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
8T0NH, Justice.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for defendants entered on the pleadings.
Charles S. Murray, a resident of St. Louis county, died intestate in 1925. His estate was probated in that county and the administrator appointed on the petition of Emma Frances Walrath, claiming to be a half sister of the deceased. In April, 1927, there was a decree of partial distribution which determined that Mrs. Walrath, William Fenlon Calkins, Edwin Walter Dykeman, and Clara Dyke-man Cook were the heirs. On appeal to the district court that decree was affirmed. The final decree of distribution was…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Partee v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
- Hass v. BillingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Wheatland v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- State ex rel. Lindekugel v. Probate Court of Sibley CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hardenbergh v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- Bengtson v. SetterbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Bloomquist v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Tankar Gas, Inc. v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Leslie v. Minneapolis Society of Fine ArtsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.