Fitzpatrick v. Simonson Bros. Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Pine county to determine the adverse claim of defendant to vacant and unoccupied land. The case was tried before Crosby, J., who found in favor of plaintiff. From a judgment entered pursuant to the findings, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.
This is an action to determine the adverse claims of defendant to eighty acres of unoccupied land in Pine county. The answer denies that plaintiff owns the land, or has any interest therein, admits that it is vacant, and sets forth two tax judgments under which defendant claimed through mesne conveyances from purchasers at the tax sales. The reply in terms
*142First, “Denies each and every allegation, matter, and thing in said answer contained, save as the same may be herein or may have been heretofore stated in his complaint.”
Second, “Alleges that all pretended tax titles, tax certificates, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Grignon's Lessee v. ASTORSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- Davis v. HudsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Greenwood v. MurraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Ladd v. WeiskopfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Anway v. Grand Rapids Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
- In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts' CompensationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Clark v. . HomesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Maharry v. EatmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Fiske v. LawtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.