In Re Estate of Hencke
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Marion Hencke, in her own behalf and as representative of the estate of Harriet I. Hencke, has appealed from an order denying in toto her blended motion for amended findings or new trial. In the printed record appears a notice of appeal by Boyal Gr. Bouschor, as special administrator of the estate of Ida M. Barthell, from a similar order and from a former order denying his motion to dismiss the bank’s appeal from the probate to the district court, but such appeal was never perfected by the filing of a return from the district court or the payment of the required fee…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Clarke v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Washburn v. Van SteenwykSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Boeing v. OwsleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Clarke's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- First and American National Bank v. HigginsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Grier v. Estate of GrierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Gabel v. FerodowillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Vesey v. VeseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Matter of KischelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- In Re Trust Under the Will of HoltCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992