Royal Indemnity Co. v. Rexford
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment in a statutory garnishment proceeding brought, under the laws of Florida, against the Royal Indemnity Company, garnishee.
Its object was to recover from garnishee as debtor to one Florence Tarr, the named insured in an automobile liability policy, the sum of $10,000 provided by it for bodily injury liability.
The claim was: that, during the effective policy period, the automobile with Mrs. Tarr riding in it became involved in a collision, resulting in serious injuries to plaintiff; that plaintiff sued and obtained judgment against Mrs. Tarr…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Cameron v. BergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Finkle v. Western Automobile InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930
- Eakle v. HayesWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Curran v. Connecticut Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Imperiali v. PicaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Potomac Insurance Company v. StanleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- Maryland Casualty Company v. Harry H. Hallatt and Mary Valentine HallattCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Roberts v. Commercial Standard Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1956
- Everett Rexford v. Royal Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.