Legal Opinion

Everett Rexford v. Royal Indemnity Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 16, 1954No. 14814PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

This is the second appearance of the above case before this court. On the former appeal, 5 Cir., 197 F.2d 83, 85, the court of appeals reversed the decision of the district court, and remanded the cause for trial on the issue of non-cooperation only. This action originated in the state court of Florida as a garnishment proceeding by appellant against Royal Indemnity Company, the insurer of Florence Tarr, against whom the appellant had obtained a default judgment for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident. The insurer removed the garnishment proceeding to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Royal Indemnity Co. v. RexfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rachal v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. Maryland Casualty Company v. Harry H. Hallatt and Mary Valentine HallattCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  3. Maryland Casualty Company v. Harry H. Hallatt and Mary Valentine HallattCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  4. Maryland Casualty Company v. Harry H. Hallatt and Mary Valentine HallattCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  5. Rachal v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API