Legal Opinion
Curran v. Connecticut Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 8, 1941PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The plaintiff recovered a judgment against Frank Carey for serious injuries received as a result of Carey’s negligence in the operation of an automobile in which the plaintiff was riding as a passenger and which came into collision with another car. Operation of the car by Carey was within the coverage of an insurance policy issued by the defendant, and he was an additional assured within its terms. The plaintiff accordingly brought this action to recover from the defendant the amount of the judgment secured against Carey. The defendant, in answer, pleaded that Carey had failed to comply with…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Rochon v. Preferred Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Bartlett v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Guerin v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Home Indem. Co. v. Reed Equipment Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- O'MORROW v. BoradCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ArghyrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
- Zitnik v. BurikIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.