Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Company v. Harry H. Hallatt and Mary Valentine Hallatt
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided November 8, 1961No. 18485PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Circuit Judge.
On April 11,1956, in West Palm Beach, Florida, the appellees, Mr. and Mrs. Hallatt, were passengers in an automobile involved in a collision with another automobile owned and operated by one James *66R. Richardson, Jr. Richardson was then a waiter residing in Palm Beach, and was insured by the appellant, Maryland Casualty Company, under a policy of automobile liability insurance which contained the following provisions:
“No action shall lie against the company unless, as a condition precedent thereto, the insured shall have complied with all the terms of this policy * * *
“Paym…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- King v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. BeazleySupreme Court of Florida · 1907
- Twyman v. RoellSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Tiedtke v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New YorkSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- Ford Motor Company v. Marvin R. MathisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- American Fire and Casualty Company v. ColluraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Barnes v. PENNSYLVANIA THRESHERMEN & FARMERS'MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Grover C. Kay v. The Home Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.