Legal Opinion
Imperiali v. Pica
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 4, 1959PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
Having recovered a judgment against the defendant Pica (hereinafter called the insured), the plaintiff brought this bill in equity to reach and apply the obligation of the defendant insurance company (hereinafter called the company) under the noncompulsory provisions of a motor vehicle policy issued by it to the insured. See G. L. c. 175, § 113; c. 214, § 3 (10). The judge made findings of material facts and ordered the bill dismissed. 1 From a decree entered in accordance with this order, the plaintiff appealed. The case comes here on an agreed record. Rule 4 of the Rules for the Regulation…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Salonen v. PaanenenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Finkle v. Western Automobile InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930
- Blair v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Pennsylvania Threshermen and Farmer's Mutual Casualty Insurance Company v. Emily S. OwensCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
- Indemnity Ins. Co. of NA v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Vicor Corp. v. Vigilant InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- DiMarzo v. American Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Lieberman v. Employers Ins. of WausauSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Darcy v. HARTFORD INS. CO. ROYAL GLOBE INS. CO.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Rogers v. Robson, Masters, Ryan, Brumund and BelomAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.