Legal Opinion
In re: Ammar Al-Baluchi
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 13, 2020No. 19-1146PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 10, 2020 Decided March 13, 2020 No. 19-1146 IN RE: AMMAR AL BALUCHI, A/K/A ALI ABDUL AZIZ ALI, PETITIONER On Petition for a Writ of Mandamus to the United States Court of Military Commission Review Alka Pradhan, Counsel, Office of Military Commissions, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the petition for a writ of mandamus and reply was Benjamin R. Farley, Trial Attorney. Danielle S. Tarin, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the opposition to the petition…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re: Hillary Clinton (REVISED)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
- State of Illinois v. David FerrieroCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023
- In re: Hillary ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
- Jason Leopold v. J. Thomas MangerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024
- In re: Michael FlynnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.