Legal Opinion
In re: Hillary Clinton (REVISED)
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 31, 2020No. 20-5056PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued June 2, 2020 Decided August 31, 2020 No. 20-5056 IN RE: HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON AND CHERYL MILLS, PETITIONERS On Panel Rehearing Of Petition for Writ of Mandamus (No. 1:14-cv-01242) David E. Kendall argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the petition for writ of mandamus and the reply were Katherine M. Turner, Stephen L. Wohlgemuth, Suraj Kumar, and Beth A. Wilkinson. Ramona R. Cotca argued the cause for respondent Judicial Watch, Inc. With her on the response to the petition for writ of mandamus were Lauren M.…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Safecard Services, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Jens Porup v. CIACourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
- Gene Schaerr v. DOJCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023
- Ryan Shapiro v. DOJCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- Pavement Coatings Technology v. United States Geological SurveyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
- State ex rel. Ctr. for Media & Democracy v. YostOhio Supreme Court · 2026
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.