Legal Opinion

In re: Michael Flynn

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 24, 2020No. 20-5143PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued June 12, 2020 Decided June 24, 2020 No. 20-5143 IN RE: MICHAEL T. FLYNN, PETITIONER On Emergency Petition for a Writ of Mandamus Sidney Powell argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the petition for a writ of mandamus were Molly McCann and Jesse R. Binnall. Jeffrey B. Wall, Deputy Solicitor General, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for respondent United States of America. With him on the response to the petition for a writ of mandamus were Noel J. Francisco, Solicitor General, Eric J. Feigin, Deputy…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re: Michael FlynnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
  2. Priscilla Lefebure v. Samuel D'aquilaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  3. United States v. FlynnDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API