Legal Opinion

California v. Trombetta

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 11, 1984No. 83-305PublishedCited by 2,803 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall

The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires the State to disclose to criminal defendants favorable evidence that is material either to guilt or to punishment. United States v. Agurs, 427 U. S. 97 (1976); Brady v. *481Maryland, 373 U. S. 83 (1963). This case raises the question whether the Fourteenth Amendment also demands that the State preserve potentially exculpatory evidence on behalf of defendants. In particular, the question presented is whether the Due Process Clause requires law enforcement agencies to preserve breath samples of suspected drunken drivers in order for the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2,803 opinions

  1. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986

2,798 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API