Legal Opinion

State v. Hall

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 13, 2004No. AC 23045PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FOTI, J.

The defendant, Dudley Hall, a physician, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, convicting him of twenty-two counts of illegally prescribing a narcotic substance in violation *437of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b) and fourteen counts of illegally prescribing a controlled substance in violation of General Statutes § 21a-277 (b). On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) admitted evidence, (2) concluded that General Statutes § 2 la-252 (a) was not unconstitutionally void for vagueness and (3) allowed an expert to testify as to an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. WargoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. State v. Jason B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. State v. AcklinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  5. State v. BretonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  2. Whitaker v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. State v. PrazeresConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  4. Kayla M. v. GreeneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  5. STATE v. HONG T.Connecticut Superior Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API