Legal Opinion
State v. Jason B.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 4, 1999No. SC 15841PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*545 Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The principal issue in this certified appeal is whether the defendant was “more than two years older” than the victim within the meaning of General Statutes § 53a-71 (a) (l).1 The defendant, Jason B., appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the trial court’s judgment adjudicating him to be a youthful offender in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1993) § 54-76b.2 The defendant claims that: (1) at the time of the incident, he was not more than two years older than the victim within the meaning of § 53a-71 (a) (1); (2) § 53a-71 (a) (1) is…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- State v. McKenzie-AdamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Ramos v. Town of VernonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. GibbsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. SorabellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. HigginsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.