Legal Opinion
State v. Prazeres
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 19, 2006No. AC 26274PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HARPER, J.
The defendant, Tan Prazeres, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion for permission to file an application for sentence review. The defendant claims that the court improperly concluded that he had received the notice of his right to sentence review to which he was entitled. We agree with the defendant and reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The relevant procedural history is not in dispute. In June, 1998, the court accepted the defendant’s plea of nolo contendere to one count of assault in the first degree. In August, 1998, the court sentenced the defendant to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- James L. v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. LuttersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. StricklandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. TuszynskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. WinerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Housing AuthorityConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. WilcoxConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- State v. BRUCE T.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.