Legal Opinion

Owensby v. Owensby

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 4, 1984No. 320A84PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Chief Justice.

The sole question presented for our review in this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in its award of a total of $6,750 in attorneys’ fees to defendant’s attorneys for legal services rendered on her behalf. Without ruling upon the reasonableness of the award, we remand the case to the trial court for further findings of fact.

The purpose of allowing counsel fees for a dependent spouse in a divorce and alimony action is to enable the spouse, as litigant, to meet the supporting spouse, as litigant, on substantially even terms, making it possible for the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Stadiem v. StadiemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United Laboratories, Inc. v. KuykendallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Friend-Novorska v. NovorskaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Overcash v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. FaginSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Davis v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API