Martin v. Martin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PeR Cueiam.
The allegations of the complaint, if established on the trial, are sufficient to base an award of alimony. Lawson v. Lawson, 244 N.C. 689, 94 S.E. 2d 826.
The court found facts, and the only findings with respect to defendant’s financial circumstances and earnings are that his “take-home” pay is $457 per mopth, and that he receives a $20 monthly pension from the Veterans Administration which is used by him “in payment of his G. I. insurance and the loan on said policy of insurance.” The court ordered that plaintiff “have the right of possession of the home of the parties, owned by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Conrad v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Coggins v. CogginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Lawson v. LawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
3Cited by15 opinions
- Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Sayland Ex Rel. McLendon v. SaylandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Plott v. PlottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Schloss v. SchlossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.