Legal Opinion

Medlen v. Estate of Meyers

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 2, 2007No. 3:05CV7201PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CARR, Chief Judge.

This is an employer intentional tort case. The plaintiff, Paul Medien, was wounded when a co-worker, Myles Meyers, entered the DaimlerChrysler Toledo North Assembly Plant with a concealed shotgun, which he used to kill another employee and wound the plaintiff and another worker. Plaintiff claims that-DaimlerChrysler created and had actual knowledge of a dangerous condition [i.e., the risk of Meyers’s violent actions] at the plant and that it was substantially certain that harm suffered by plaintiff and the others whom Meyers assaulted and shot would occur.

Medien also…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Mussivand v. DavidOhio Supreme Court · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Timothy Ulrick v. Norm KunzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. ULRICK v. KunzDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API