Legal Opinion

Timothy Ulrick v. Norm Kunz

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 22, 2009No. 09-3327UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.

Together with his family, Timothy Ul-rick, a carpenter attacked by Norm Kunz, a labor supervisor working for their joint employer, Ahal Contracting Co., brought a claim of employer intentional tort against Ahal. The district court granted Ahal’s motion for summary judgment after finding that the Ulricks had failed to demonstrate that Ahal was “substantially certain” that Kunz would injure anyone, and so had failed to demonstrate that Ahal had the requisite intent under the employer intentional tort exception to the exclusive remedy provision of Ohio’s worker’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Fyffe v. Jeno's, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shronna Whipple v. CoreCivic, Inc., et al.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026
  2. Spencer v. Hilton Corporate OfficeDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API