Legal Opinion

ULRICK v. Kunz

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided January 26, 2009No. Case 3:07 CV 3168Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JACK ZOUHARY, District Judge.

Introduction

Plaintiff Timothy Ulrick filed his Complaint (Doc. No. 1) in October 2007. Plaintiff sued Defendant Norman Kunz for the intentional torts of assault and battery. Plaintiff sued Defendant Ahal Contracting Co. (“Ahal”) for employer intentional tort.

Pending before the Court is Ahal’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 55). Plaintiff Timothy Ulrick filed an Opposition (Doc. No. 72), and Ahal replied (Doc. No. 73). (Timothy Ulrick’s wife and children are also plaintiffs, bringing claims for loss of consortium, and their claims…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. 60 Ivy Street Corporation (86-5500), and Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc., (86-5517) v. R.C. Alexander and Doris AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  5. Vincent C. Wiley v. United States of America Citizens Federal Mortgage Corporation State of Ohio Franklin County Treasurer and Houng ThaiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API