United States v. Brooks
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Opinion of the Court
Judge STUCKY delivered the opinion of the Court.
We granted review in this case to decide whether brig personnel violated Appellant’s Sixth Amendment right to appellate counsel by monitoring his telephone conversations with his appellate counsel and by seizing his privileged correspondence. We hold that, even assuming some interference with his attorney-client relationship, Appellant failed to articulate or show any prejudice, and affirm.
I
Appellant pled guilty at a general court-martial to failing to obey a restriction order, obstruction of justice, and adultery. Articles 92 and 134, Uniform…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. McMurrinCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
- United States v. BarberiCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
- Lewis v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- United States v. HutchinsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
- United States v. WiechmannCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.