Szarzynski v. Szarzynski
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHUMAKER, Judge.
In these consolidated appeals in this post-dissolution dispute, appellant-father Thomas Szarzynski argues that the district court (a) should have implemented a particular parenting access schedule; (b) should have given him an evidentiary hearing on his motion to modify custody; (c) should not have removed a particular parenting consultant; (d) should not have ruled father to be a nuisance litigant; (e) improperly awarded respondent-mother Therese Szarzynski conduct-based attorney fees; (f) failed to give father and his former attorney adequate notice of a contempt…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Balder v. HaleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Marriage of Goldman v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Marriage of Boland v. MurthaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- In re the Welfare of the Children of L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Citizens for Rule of Law v. Senate Committee on Rules & AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Niemi v. Girl Scouts of Minnesota & Wisconsin Lakes & PinesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.