Legal Opinion

Szarzynski v. Szarzynski

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 22, 2007No. A06-882, A06-1417PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHUMAKER, Judge.

In these consolidated appeals in this post-dissolution dispute, appellant-father Thomas Szarzynski argues that the district court (a) should have implemented a particular parenting access schedule; (b) should have given him an evidentiary hearing on his motion to modify custody; (c) should not have removed a particular parenting consultant; (d) should not have ruled father to be a nuisance litigant; (e) improperly awarded respondent-mother Therese Szarzynski conduct-based attorney fees; (f) failed to give father and his former attorney adequate notice of a contempt…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Balder v. HaleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Marriage of Goldman v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  2. Marriage of Boland v. MurthaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  3. In re the Welfare of the Children of L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  4. Citizens for Rule of Law v. Senate Committee on Rules & AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  5. Niemi v. Girl Scouts of Minnesota & Wisconsin Lakes & PinesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API