Legal Opinion

Marriage of Boland v. Murtha

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 6, 2011No. A10-1794PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUDSON, Judge.

Appellant-mother challenges the district court’s denial of her motion to restrict respondent-father’s parenting time without an evidentiary hearing. We remand because it appears that the district court failed to treat the allegations in mother’s affidavits as true and to disregard assertions to the contrary in father’s affidavits. We also deny father’s motion for attorney fees on appeal because mother’s appeal did not unreasonably contribute to the length or expense of the proceeding.

FACTS

The parties were married on October 31, 1998, and their marriage was dissolved by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marriage of Nice-Petersen v. Nice-PetersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Marriage of Goldman v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  3. Morey v. PeppinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Geibe v. GeibeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  5. Szarzynski v. SzarzynskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Welfare of the Children of L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  2. Amarreh v. AmarrehCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
  3. In re the Marriage of: Melissa Jo Butler v. Vance Aaron ButlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  4. In re the Marriage of: Tamara Eileen Goemaat v. Andrew Joel GoemaatCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  5. In re the Marriage of: Thomas M. Dillahunt v. Tami L. Dillahunt, n/k/a Tami L. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API