Legal Opinion
Tierney v. Safeco Insurance
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided April 16, 1963No. Civ. No. 62-425PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KILKENNY, District Judge.
The parties are in entire agreement on the facts in this ease. My decision must rest on a proper application of the law to those agreed facts, including exhibits, and the inferences to be drawn therefrom. This procedure necessarily includes a proper construction of the insurance policy on which plaintiff bases his case.
Robert Martin, then a resident of the State of Washington, purchased from defendant in said State, a policy of public liability insurance, which policy was delivered in said State, on or prior to the *5917th day of August, 1960. Said policy insured Martin…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Carroll v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Aetna Life Insurance v. DunkenSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- George v. Employers' Liability Assur. CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bailey v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Central Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1964
- Snook v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1963
- Oregon Automobile Insurance v. SalzbergCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Bailey v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970