Oregon Automobile Insurance v. Salzberg
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtCallow, J.
— The insured driver, Salzberg, and Simpson, his passenger, were defendants in an action brought by the insurer to secure relief from responsibility under an automobile insurance policy. The defendant-passenger alone appeals from a summary judgment granted the plaintiff-insurer. The summary judgment was granted on the ground that the insured had failed to cooperate with the insurer thereby relieving the insured of any duty to defend Salzberg against Simpson’s claim for injuries suffered in an accident or pay any judgment entered on the claim.
*667The defendants Harvey Salzberg and Ralph Simpson…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Jenkins v. Mayflower Insurance ExchangeArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Campbell v. Allstate Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, Mich. v. Winget Winget v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, MichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- MFA Mutual Insurance Co. v. CheekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Tibbs v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981