Legal Opinion
George v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corporation
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 31, 1929No. 6 Div. 963PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
This case was brought by authority of sections 8376 and 8377 of the Code of, Alabama. These sections give, an equitable remedy in favor of a plaintiff with judgment unsatisfied after 30 days against a carrier of liability insurance covering the loss.
The complainant alleges facts entitling her to relief. But the defense is that the contract of insurance contains the following clauses: “Whenever requested by tbe corporation, the assured shall aid in securing information and evidence and the attendance of witnesses and in effecting settlement and in prosecuting appeals. * * * Tile assured shall…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lorando v. GethroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Schoenfeld v. New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Roth v. National Automobile Mutual Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Cogliano v. FergusonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Morewitz v. West of England Ship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n (Luxembourg)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- Hynding v. Home Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Home Indem. Co. v. Reed Equipment Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Rochon v. Preferred Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Finkle v. Western Automobile InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.