Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Comm'n
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone
The question is whether the full faith and credit which the Constitution requires to be given to a Massachusetts workmen’s compensation statute precludes California' from applying its own workmen’s compensation act in the case of an injury suffered by a Massachusetts employee of a Massachusetts employer while in California in the course of his employment.
Petitioner, an insurance carrier, under - the California Workmen’s Compensation, Insurance and Safety Act, for the Pacific Coast branch of the employer, Dewey & Almy Chemical Company, a Massachusetts corporation, filed its petition in the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Mountain Timber Company v. State of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by287 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
282 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.