Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1970PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an action on an insurance policy by a person injured in an automobile accident, who filed this action after obtaining an unpaid judgment against the driver of the vehicle alleged to be covered by that policy.

Defendant denied coverage on three grounds: (1) that the policy, issued to an automobile dealer, did not cover the car involved in the accident; (2) that defendant was given no notice of the true facts of the accident, and (3) that the driver of the car failed to cooperate in the defense of the original action. The case was tried before the court, sitting without a jury.

Prior to…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Thrasher v. United States Liability InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Barrera v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Imperiali v. PicaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  5. Allegretto v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1932

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ReuterOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Darcy v. HARTFORD INS. CO. ROYAL GLOBE INS. CO.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Corwin Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. Westchester Fire Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Employers Ins. of Wausau v. Tektronix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. Shadbolt v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1976

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API