Legal Opinion

Hastaran v. Marchand

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1913No. Civ. No. 1197PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. Frank B. Smith, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. A. Heynemann, C. F. Adams, and Lande & Woodworth, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiffs and also from an order denying the defendant a new trial.

The action was one to rescind a contract of purchase and sale of personal property and for the recovery of the purchase price thereof, upon the ground of fraud. The case was tried by the court without a jury, and findings were made in favor of the plaintiffs in substantial accord with the allegations of the complaint. Judgment was entered upon the findings on September 7,1911, and on the following day defendant served and filed her notice of intention to move for a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Webber v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. People v. Woon Tuck WoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. People v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Sather Banking Co. v. Arthur R. Briggs Co.California Supreme Court · 1903

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dalton v. GoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Lewith v. RehmkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Tukes v. RichardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API