Legal Opinion

Essex Electro Engineers, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 5, 1991No. 90-174CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, to consolidate with this proceeding two appeals pending before the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (“ASBCA”). Also pending are plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and its motion for sanctions. The principal sums due to plaintiff under three change orders have been paid as a result of administrative settlement. This action concerns plaintiff’s attempt to recover interest on those settlement sums from the date it made submissions purporting to be claims…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dawco Construction, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  2. The Borough of Alpine v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  3. Hoffman Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  4. Mayfair Construction Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. Claude E. Atkins Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Essex Electro Engineers, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  2. Santa Fe Engineers, Inc. v. H. Lawrence Garrett, Iii, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  3. CPT Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  4. Detroit International Bridge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  5. Kirkham Constructors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API