CPT Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:
This case is before the court on defendant’s motions for summary judgment and to dismiss part of the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, the court sua sponte dismisses the complaint, without prejudice, for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter.
FACTS
In 1983, the General Services Administration (GSA) entered into schedule contracts with CPT Corporation which allowed various government agencies to rent Automatic Data Processing Equipment (ADPE) from CPT. Included in the schedule contracts were provisions for…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Dawco Construction, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Arctic Corner, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sterling Millwrights, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- Medina Construction, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Kraft, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Gutz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Sarang Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.