Legal Opinion
Kirkham Constructors, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 22, 1993No. 93-256CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1). Plaintiff has opposed. The issue to be decided is whether plaintiffs claim was properly submitted to the contracting officer under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (1988 & Supp. IV 1992) (the “CDA”). Argument is deemed unnecessary.
FACTS
Kirkham Constructors, Inc. (“plaintiff’), entered into contract No. F04684-90-C-0027 with the Base Contracting Division, Vanden-berg Air Force Base (“the Air Force”), on July 2, 1990. The initial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Contract Cleaning Maintenance, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Dawco Construction, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Transamerica Insurance Corporation, Inc., for and on Behalf of Stroup Sheet Metal Works v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- United States v. General Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Essex Electro Engineers, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- North Star Alaska Housing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- CPS Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Johnson Lasky Kindelin Architects, Inc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020