Legal Opinion

Essex Electro Engineers, Inc. v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 17, 1992No. 91-5096PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHEL, Circuit Judge.

Essex Electro Engineers, Inc. appeals the summary judgment of the United States Claims Court denying Essex’s claim for interest under the Contract Disputes Act (CDA). Essex Electro Engineers, Inc. v. United States, 22 Cl.Ct. 757 (1991). The Claims Court held that Essex’s submissions were not CDA claims entitling Essex to interest because there was no dispute at the time they were made. However, we hold that the submissions are not claims because they did not seek a sum certain as a matter of right as required by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) which implements…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Dawco Construction, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  3. Essex Electro Engineers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Reflectone, Inc. v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. Alliant Techsystems, Inc., Global Environmental Solutions Business Division v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  3. Aerolease Long Beach v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  4. H.L. Smith, Inc. v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Heyl & Patterson, Inc. v. Sean C. O'keefe, Acting Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API