Tata v. Muskovitz

*698Black, J.

(after stating the facts). As I read the multitudinous pages and the various opinions one finds under the title of Sheppard v. Michigan National Bank, 348 Mich 577, our massive chirographic effort in that case arrived at this result; Mr. Justice Smith’s dissent in Wieda v. American Box Board Company, 343 Mich 182, 191, became and now re*699mains reliable Michigan law. In another related direction the same metamorphous change took place —that of adopting earlier dissenting opinions, and earlier prevailing opinions, as the law of onr State. I refer here to the succession of opinions shown…