Legal Opinion

Staab v. Diocese of St. Cloud

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 18, 2012No. A09-1335PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIETZEN, Justice.

This appeal requires us to interpret the meaning of Minn.Stat. § 604.02, subd. 1 (2010), to determine whether a defendant must pay an entire damages award when a special jury verdict attributes 50% of the negligence to the sole defendant and 50% of the negligence to a nonparty to the lawsuit. Appellant Staab brought suit against respondent Diocese of St. Cloud for injuries she sustained on premises it owned and operated. The district court ruled that Minn.Stat. § 604.02, subd. 1, does not apply in an action against only one defendant and ordered the defendant to pay…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Beaudette v. FranaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Imlay v. City of Lake CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. State v. ThonesavanhSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  2. State v. RickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  3. Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A" v. CVS Caremark Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  4. Citizens State Bank Norwood Young America v. Gordon BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  5. Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald DriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API