Staab v. Diocese of St. Cloud
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Justice.
This appeal requires us to interpret the meaning of Minn.Stat. § 604.02, subd. 1 (2010), to determine whether a defendant must pay an entire damages award when a special jury verdict attributes 50% of the negligence to the sole defendant and 50% of the negligence to a nonparty to the lawsuit. Appellant Staab brought suit against respondent Diocese of St. Cloud for injuries she sustained on premises it owned and operated. The district court ruled that Minn.Stat. § 604.02, subd. 1, does not apply in an action against only one defendant and ordered the defendant to pay…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Beaudette v. FranaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Imlay v. City of Lake CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- State v. ThonesavanhSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- State v. RickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A" v. CVS Caremark Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Citizens State Bank Norwood Young America v. Gordon BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald DriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.