Grobuskie v. Shipman Koal Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
The only question raised by this appeal is whether there was competent testimony to show that the accidental injury sustained by claimant resulted in the growth or development of the cancer, which immediately caused his disability for the period compensation was allowed. If there was the judgment must be affirmed: Stahl v. Watson Coal Co., 268 Pa. 452.
The following facts may be summarized from the testimony : Claimant was at work, on April 10, 1920, timbering on a pitch in defendant’s mine. While in the act' of setting up a prop, a second prop slid down the pitch and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fink v. Sheldon Axle & Spring Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Stahl v. Watson Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Davis v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Sullivan v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Tracey v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Elonis v. Lytle Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Smith v. Primrose Tapestry Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Paul v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Bunnell v. State Workmen's Insurance FundSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Dorsch v. Fisher Scientific Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.