Dorsch v. Fisher Scientific Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion bt
Keller, P. J.,
This is a workmen’s compensation case.
The judgment entered in the court below on the compensation award to the claimant must be reversed and the award set aside for two reasons: (1) For failure of the claimant to give notice to the employer of the occurrence of the injury within ninety days after its occurrence, as required by statute, 1 unless the employer had actual knowledge of the occurrence of the injury within that time, which was not here shown; (2) because of lack of evidence to show that the loss of claimant’s right eye was caused by the accident alleged in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. BaxterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Davis v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Johnson v. Valvoline Oil Co. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Uditsky v. KrakovitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Grobuskie v. Shipman Koal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Katz v. Evening BulletinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Roschak Et Ux. v. Vulcan Iron WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Allen v. Patterson-Emerson-Comstock, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Canterna v. United States Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Beck v. Franklin Glass Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.