Legal Opinion

Smith v. Primrose Tapestry Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 23, 1925No. Appeal, 359PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

George Smith, a skilled laborer employed by the Primrose Tapestry Company, was engaged, on December 9, 1921, in unloading a box from a truck, as a part of his regular work. It slipped and fell against him, causing the injury which, it is claimed, later resulted in death. The only external mark produced was a bruise on the side. On the same day, the deceased was placed in the care of his family physician, a Dr. Davis, who furnished such' medical treatment as was believed necessary. Though previously in good health, Smith became pro gressively worse, and his ability…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gausman v. R. T. Pearson Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Horn v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Guyer v. Equitable Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Siplyak v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. Morgan v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Menarde v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. In Re LarsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Claim of Miller v. National Cabinet Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Lewis v. Connolly Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  5. Wilkinson v. United Parcel Service of Pennsylvania, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API