Legal Opinion

Bunnell v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 26, 1936No. Appeal, 261PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

This is a workmen’s compensation case; and the only question involved is whether there is legally competent evidence to sustain the referee’s findings that there was a causal connection between the accidental injury which the husband of the claimant suffered on June 23, 1930, and his death from pneumonia on February 12, 1933. The referee found for the claimant, and his award was affirmed by the board and the court below. Defendant insurance carrier has appealed.

The testimony upon which the referee found that deceased’s death resulted from an injury to his back may be…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Fink v. Sheldon Axle & Spring Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. McCrosson v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Johnston v. Payne-Yost Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Anderson v. BaxterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Witt v. Witt's Food Mkt. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Walsh v. Penn Anthracite Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Johnson v. Valvoline Oil Co. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Beck v. Franklin Glass Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Williams v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Fronko v. United States Sanitary Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API