Legal Opinion
Barnhill v. Multiple Injury Trust Fund
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 11, 2001No. 94,575PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavender, J.
11 We decide whether an April 4, 2000 order of a Workers Compensation Court (WCC) trial judge correctly denied a request by petitioner, Tony Barnhill (Barnhill or claimant) to require respondent, the Multiple Injury Trust Fund (Fund) 1 to pay him permanent total disability (PTD) benefits that claimant asserts "accrued" between the date of an August 1999 PTD order and the date (mid-February 2000) Fund was directed by the PTD order's terms to begin making weekly PTD payments to him. We hold the trial judge correctly denied the request based on 85 0.8. Supp.1995, § 172 (effective November 4,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Neil Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Wingrod Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Samman v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Arrow Tool & Gauge v. MeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- State ex rel. Department of Human Services ex rel. Jones v. BaggettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Houck v. Hold Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Starkey v. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- Elwell v. Oklahoma, Ex Rel. Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Dolese Bros. Co. v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Multiple Injury Trust Fund v. PullumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- White v. HENG LY LIMSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.