Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Department of Human Services ex rel. Jones v. Baggett
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 13, 1999No. 88,015PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavender, J.
¶ 1 On certiorari, the following questions must be answered:(1) Did the trial court err in entering a judgment ordering appellant, Bryce A. Baggett, Jr. — father of child — to reimburse appellee, the Oklahoma Department of Human Services (DHS), for monies allegedly paid to mother for the support of child under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program, without being presented evidence to show the amount of AFDC payments to mother?(2) Was the trial court required, by the dictates of Oklahoma’s child support statutes, to use zero for father’s gross monthly income for the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Neil Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Wingrod Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Peters v. Golden Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Ohler v. OhlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- Noddin v. NoddinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Koch v. WilliamsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Badillo v. Mid Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Barnes v. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Rivas v. Parkland ManorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- State v. TorresSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Upton v. State Ex Rel. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.