Legal Opinion
Multiple Injury Trust Fund v. Pullum
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 11, 2001No. 95,834PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavender, J.
T1 Today's cause requires us to decide whether a Workers' Compensation Court (WCC) three-judge panel erred in ruling permanent total disability (PTD) benefits awarded to Elizabeth Ann Pullum (Pullum or claimant) from the Multiple Injury Trust Fund (Fund) 1 would "acerue" from the date of the panel's order. We hold the panel erred because 85 0.8. Supp.1995, § 172 (effective November 4, 1994)-the law when claimant's last job-related injury occurred and which unambiguously set the boundaries of Fund's PTD liability to her-required PTD benefits from Fund to begin on a date certain, said date…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Samman v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Special Indemnity Fund v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Associated General Contractors v. Board of Oil, Gas & MiningUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- Johnson v. City of WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. SouthernSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Starkey v. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. v. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSIONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- BALL v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUNDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Conaghan v. Riverfield Country Day SchoolSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Hogg v. Oklahoma County Juvenile BureauSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.