Legal Opinion

People v. Peterson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1909No. Docket No. 155PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from Wexford; Chittenden, J. William Peterson was convicted of violating the liquor law.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

The single question presented is whether the giving of liquor by a host to his adult guests, by way of hospitality in his own home, violates the provisions of Act No. 207, Pub. Acts 1889, known as the “local option law.” It is a misdemeanor, punishable by fine or by imprisonment, for any person to, himself, or by his clerk, agent or employe, directly or indirectly, manufacture, sell, keep for sale, give away, or furnish any vinous, malt, brewed, etc., liquors, or to keep a saloon or any other place where such liquors are manufactured, sold, stored for sale, given away, or furnished, with an…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. MyersMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Engelbert v. TuttleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. People v. BedellMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. People v. HancockMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. People v. McCallMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API