Legal Opinion

Ciarelli v. Commercial Union Insurance

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 8, 1995No. 15165PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether, in the case of an accident involving only one tortfeasor vehicle, an injured party is required to exhaust the liability limits of the insurance policies of both the owner and the operator of that vehicle in order to trigger underinsured motorist benefits. The plaintiff, Florence A. Ciarelli, appeals from the judgment of the trial court confirming an arbitration panel’s denial of underinsured motorist benefits that the plaintiff sought pursuant to her insurance policy with the defendant, the Commercial Union Insurance Companies. The trial court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. General Accident Insurance v. WheelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Elliot v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. Continental Insurance v. Cebe-HaberskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. Travelers Insurance v. KullaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Haynes v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Rizzo Pool Co. v. Del GrossoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Curran v. Progressive Northwestern Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Ploen v. Union InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Country Mutual Insurance v. FonkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API