General Accident Insurance v. Wheeler
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBerdon, J.
The sole issue raised in this appeal is whether an insured, where there is more than one tortfeasor responsible for the accident, may recover under his or her underinsured motorist policy before first exhausting the liability insurance policies of all the tortfeasors. We conclude that an insured is required to exhaust the liability insurance coverage of only one tortfeasor in order to recover underinsured benefits.
The parties presented their claims on the basis of the following stipulated facts. The defendant, Matthew Wheeler (insured), a resident of the household of his father, James…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Texaco Refining & Marketing Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Nationwide Insurance v. GodeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Motorists Mutual Ins. Co. v. TomanskiOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- Gionfriddo v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Dunlap v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Quimby v. Kimberly Clark Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Lunsford v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
- Hansen v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Eskin v. CastigliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.