Legal Opinion
Continental Insurance v. Cebe-Habersky
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 20, 1990No. 13756PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCovello, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the trial court vacating a $40,000 underinsured motorist arbitration award. The sole issue is whether a claimant’s access to underinsured motorist insurance first requires the payment of the limits of the liability policy insuring the person responsible for the accident. We conclude that such payments are required.
On November 30,1985, the plaintiff, The Continental Insurance Company (Continental), had in force an automobile liability policy insuring the defendant, Edward Cebe-Habersky. The policy contained an endorsement providing uninsured and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. BlaskoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Beloff v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
3Cited by39 opinions
- Danbeck v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Williams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- General Accident Insurance v. WheelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Cobb v. BenjaminCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.