Legal Opinion

Conkey v. State, Department of Administration, Division of Motor Vehicles

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 2005No. S-11361PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this case we must decide whether riding a towed snowmobile with limited steering ability constitutes operating a motor vehicle under Alaska law. Because a snowmobile is designed to be self-propelled, we hold that even a towed snowmobile is a motor vehicle. Because steering such a vehicle, even if only partially, involves exercising control over the vehicle, we hold that it amounts to operating the vehicle. Accordingly, we affirm the decisions below holding that riding a snowmobile towed by another vehicle constitutes operation of a motor vehicle…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. CoonAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. RuonaMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  4. State v. TaceySupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  5. Jacobson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McDonald v. TrihubAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Button v. Haines BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Walsh v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006
  4. Benavides v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Doubleday v. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API