Doubleday v. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
A commercial fisher appeals the denial of his application for permits for two fisheries. The Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission denied the permit applications because the fisher produced no evidence of his participation in one fishery and evidence of only minimal participation in the other. On appeal, the fisher argues that he could not meet his burden of proof because the State destroyed or lost the records necessary to prove his case, and that therefore this court should apply the spoliation of evidence doe-trine to conclude that the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Sweet v. Sisters of Providence in WashingtonAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Johns v. Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Kellis v. CritesAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Rhodes v. ErionAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Ben Lomond, Inc. v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mills v. HanklaAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- RBG Bush Planes, LLC v. KirkAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Hodari v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
- Mattox v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Nelson v. Original Smith & Wesson Business Entities and/or CorporationsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.