Legal Opinion

People v. Ward

California Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1904No. Crim. No. 946PublishedCited by 18 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco amending the judgment. F. H. Dunne, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

The defendant was convicted of embezzlement in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco on November 14, 1899, and judgment was rendered by the court, Hon. F. H. Dunne, judge presiding, on December 2, 1899. Defendant appealed to this court from the judgment, the record on such appeal showing a judgment regular on its face, and on October 11, 1901, the judgment was affirmed. (134 Cal. 301.)

It was subsequently discovered that the only minute entry of a judgment in the superior court was the following, viz:—

“Saturday, December 2, 1899.
“The People of the State of California v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Kaufman v. ShainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Ward v. DunneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Morrison v. McCueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. WilkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Eckstrom v. Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. School District No. 3 v. Western Tube Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1905
  4. People v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Wutchumna Water Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API